Adding my own reiteration on the same topic, which I originally posted in a separate topic. This does not seem like an onerous change, even if it is a checkbox to "show more transactions" from the default ones that come up. The current workarounds are stupidly painful. So clearly I cannot choose the cup in front of me am voting for this.
-snip-
There are a couple of times I have paid an employees single pay in two parts... there are a couple of reasons why I have had to do this... but my point is if you DO do this it is impossible to balance the bank transactions when they come through.
When it comes to bank transactions, it will not display any matching items (i.e. a pay) that is greater than the amount of that single bank transaction. So in the case where the pay has gone in in two parts, I just cannot allocate the bank transactions to the pay. I have to retract the payslip, manually break it up into two parts that match the bank transactions (which can be interesting) to match them up.
Why can we not allocate two bank transactions to a single pay? Can this be changed?
Thanks
AM
Related Content
- 2 years ago
- 7 months ago
- 3 months ago
- 10 months ago
- 2 months ago